International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
|
Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2025 | |
Research PaperOpenAccess | |
Artificial Intelligence: The Final Frontier |
|
1Professor, University of St. Thomas School of Law, 1000 LaSalle Avenue, MSL 400, Minneapolis, MN 55403, USA. E-mail: kaal8634@stthomas.edu
*Corresponding Author | |
Int.Artif.Intell.&Mach.Learn. 5(1) (2025) 37-57, DOI: https://doi.org/10.51483/IJAIML.5.1.2025.37-57 | |
Received: 11/12/2024|Accepted: 05/01/2025|Published: 25/01/2025 |
Contemporary Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) systems, particularly Large Language Models (“LLMs”), face an imminent shortage of high-quality, human generated textual data, a phenomenon often termed “data exhaustion”. This article examines the limitations of existing centralized data-annotation frameworks, highlighting critical issues such as bias, high computational overhead, and insufficiently adaptive infrastructures. Current market participants-including Scale AI, Appen, CloudFactory, and others-excel at rapidly scaling annotation services yet struggle with ethical sourcing, privacy compliance, and equitable compensation. In addition, legal and regulatory concerns, exemplified by stringent mandates such as the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), constrain the free flow of data essential for advanced AI research. As a corrective measure, decentralized data production paradigms are proposed, including the adoption of smart contracts, token-based incentives, and participatory governance through Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (“DAOs”). While existing decentralized initiatives-SingularityNET, Fetch.ai, Ocean Protocol, Numeraire, and DcentAI-offer incremental innovations in reputation management and stakeholder engagement, they fail to fully address the nuanced requirements of large-scale “Mechanical Turk”-style data creation. In contrast, the author proposes a Weighted Directed Acyclic Graph (“WDAG”) governance model which provides a multi-dimensional reputation framework, facilitating real-time validation of
data contributions, adaptive ethical and legal compliance, and collaborative oversight by diverse community members. Findings suggest that such WDAGcentric systems can more effectively maintain data quality, ensure ethical alignment, and incentivize broad participation, thereby mitigating the looming data shortage and expanding AI’s societal benefits. Ultimately, successful implementation requires coordinated efforts among policymakers, industry practitioners, and civil society actors to sustain both the technological and ethical integrity of AI research. By integrating WDAG-based governance with emerging decentralized solutions, the AI community may realize a more equitable, scalable, and future-ready paradigm for data provisioning.
Keywords: Web3, Artificial Intelligence, Decentralization, LLMs,Data Governance, Privacy, Smart Contracts, DAO, WDAG, Ethical AI, GDPR
Full text | Download |
Copyright © SvedbergOpen. All rights reserved